Spread the love

What Is “Cancel Culture?

Cancel culture refers to the popular practice of withdrawing support for public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. This behavior often occurs on social media platforms, where people collectively reject and stop supporting someone due to them being offended or by statements/comments they disagree with.

Cancel culture is generally discussed as being performed in the form of group shaming . While some view cancel culture as a tool to stop offensive and harmful behavior, others find it problematic and toxic. The impact of cancel culture on mental health can be significant, as it often turns into bullying, leading to feelings of ostracism, social isolation, and loneliness for the canceled individuals.

What Procreating Chickens & Cancel Culture Have in Common

Cancel culture, a phenomenon that has gained traction in recent years, is a dangerous and totalitarian trend that threatens open dialogue and mental health. It involves public shaming, ostracism, and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought1. While some argue that cancel culture holds people accountable for their actions, it often goes too far, leading to toxic consequences for both the canceled individuals and society as a whole.

The Impact on Open Dialogue:

Cancel culture creates an environment where people are afraid to express their opinions, leading to an intolerance of opposing views. This stifles open dialogue and prevents the healthy exchange of ideas that is essential for a democratic society. By encouraging people to denounce others for their beliefs, cancel culture promotes a mindset that is reminiscent of totalitarian regimes. This atmosphere of fear and suspicion undermines the very foundation of free speech and open discourse.

The Impact on Mental Health:

Cancel culture can have severe consequences on mental health, as it often involves bullying, social isolation, and loneliness. The canceled individuals may experience anxiety, depression, and even trauma as a result of the public shaming and ostracism they face. Furthermore, cancel culture can also affect the mental health of those who participate in the canceling, as it creates an us-versus-them dynamic that amplifies problems rather than addressing them.

The Role of Social Media:

Social media plays a significant role in the spread of cancel culture, as it provides a platform for public shaming and amplifies the voices of those who seek to cancel others. The immediacy and reach of social media can quickly turn a minor transgression into a viral scandal, making it difficult for the targeted individual to defend themselves or recover from the damage to their reputation.

The dangers of cancel culture are real and must be addressed to protect open dialogue and mental health in our society. It is essential to promote open conversations, understanding, and empathy, rather than resorting to public shaming and ostracism. By fostering a culture of tolerance and respect for differing opinions, we can counteract the toxic effects of cancel culture and create a more inclusive and healthy society.

How Does Cancel Culture Impact Employment?

Cancel culture can negatively impact employment in several ways. When business leaders or employees are canceled, they may lose their jobs, customers, or opportunities for advancement. This can lead to job loss and difficulty finding new employment. Additionally, the fear of being canceled can lead to self-censorship, as people become afraid to voice their opinions.

The mental health effects of cancel culture can also impact employment. Being canceled can lead to feelings of ostracism, social isolation, and loneliness, which may affect job performance and overall well-being. Furthermore, cancel culture can create an “us-versus-them” dynamic that amplifies problems rather than addressing them, potentially damaging workplace relationships and productivity.

In summary, cancel culture can have significant consequences for both businesses and employees, affecting job security, mental health, and workplace dynamics.

What Happens When Cancel Culture Backfires?

When cancel culture backfires, it can lead to several negative consequences. It can create an “us-versus-them” dynamic that amplifies the problem rather than addressing it, potentially worsening the situation and further dividing people.

Moreover, cancel culture can have unintended consequences on the mental health of both the cancelers and the canceled, causing anxiety, depression, and even trauma. In some cases, cancel culture may not effectively address the shortcomings of the individuals or organizations involved, leading to unresolved issues and a lack of meaningful change. Overall, when cancel culture backfires, it can result in more harm than good, affecting cancelers workplaces, and their community as a whole.

A warning to those who engage in cancel culture: while the intention may be to hold people accountable for their actions, cancel culture can have unintended consequences. It can create an “us-versus-them” dynamic that amplifies the problem rather than addressing it.

A Warning To Those That are The “cancelers”

1. Cancel culture can backfire, leading to negative effects on the mental health of both the cancelers and the canceled, causing anxiety, depression, and even trauma

1. Furthermore, cancel culture can lead to a chilling effect on free speech and self-expression, as people become afraid to voice their opinions for fear of being canceled themselves

2. It is essential to consider the potential consequences and seek more constructive ways to address issues and hold people accountable without resorting to cancel culture.

In other words, don’t do it, and if you do, well you may end up reaping what you sow, and the chickens will come home to roost, and chickens procreate like a MF’er, more than rabbits.

Jeniffer Wexton on:

public Safety

Crime has vaulted near the top of voters’ concerns, just after the economy and inflation. According to Gallup, 80 percent of Americans worry “a great deal” or a “fair amount” about crime, the highest level in two decades.


Such fears pose yet another midterm election hurdle for Democrats, on top of public angst over soaring prices and President Biden’s dismal public approval ratings.


As a former prosecutor, substitute judge, legal advocate for children, state Senator, and as a legislator, Jennifer Wexton should be well aware that our society is a dangerous place. Wexton should understand that our children, the elderly, and everyone else in between needs to be protected from violent criminals and repeat offenders. She ignores this and advocates on their behalf with light sentences, “no cash bail”, Criminal Justice Reform, and Restorative Justice.


Do you recall the rape of a (15) year old girl in a Loudoun County High School bathroom in May 2021 by a transgendered student? If this wasn’t bad enough, “Criminal Justice Reform” allowed for the rapists sentenced to be reduced, removing him from the sexual assault registry and providing supervised probation. To make matters worse, the Loudoun County Public Schools Superintendent Scott Ziegler IGNORED the federally mandated processes and procedures when incidents of this nature occur, and now Wexton is abolishing Title IX protections under HR5-Equality Act.


Jennifer Wexton got the ball rolling on the rapists lenient sentence by introducing Bill NO. 1082 in 2017, which passed (and she’s proud of it, see video during meeting with NAACP).

In 2019, Wexton proudly endorsed Buta Biberaj for Loudoun County Commonwealth Attorney. Prior to being elected, Biberaj was the legal redress for the Loudoun NAACP; this is not an insignificant detail. Biberaj also belongs to the Virginia Progressive Prosecutors For Justice. The VPPFJ’s primary goal is “Criminal Justice Reform” or “Restorative Justice”.


Wexton, Biberaj are closely aligned Progressive ideologues and share questionable associations with a variety of organizations and people.

Who could forget the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020 over George Floyd. Wexton is so radical that she sponsored the “George Floyd Justice Policing Act” (defund the police) and the “Mental Health Justice Act” that allowed for increased funding for social workers that are meant to take the place of police officers around the country.


These are only a few examples of what Wexton and the Progressive Democrats “Criminal Justice Reform” and “Restorative Justice” look like for Public Safety:


More on Wexton and Public Safety

%d bloggers like this: