Spread the love

Loudoun County Election Fraud (allegedly): $355,000 in Zucker-Bucks

I think it’s fair to say that people’s eyes have become crossed with all of the election fraud talk from across the country.  We’ve been presented with tons of data, data tables, charts, graphs, and experts.  One topic that has caused a lot of discussion is “Zucker-Bucks”.  However, what are “Zucker-Bucks” anyways?  Until very recently, to me anyways, it simply meant Zuckerburg ponied up $350M to influence the outcome of the election.  While this is true, I didn’t really understand the “how” behind it, until now.


Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan reportedly donated a total of $350 million to CTCL (Center for Tech and Civic Life), which is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.   The organization pushes for left-of-center voting policies and election administration. It has a wide reach into local elections offices across the nation and is funded by many left-of-center funding organizations.


Under section 170(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of the IRS allows for external organizations to give charitable contributions to governmental units. In 2020, under this IRS provision the CTCL awarded millions of tax deductible dollars as 2,500 different “COVID-19 Response” grants to select cities and counties across the United States, Including Loudoun County ($355,000).  When distributing the money (grants) CTCL bypassed the VA state government and distributed the money directly to counties such as Loudoun County.  The problem here is that counties like Loudoun did NOT acquire these funds through the proper channels, ensuring HAVA (Help America Vote Act) and the VA Constitution requirements were met.  The amount of money being granted by CTCL should have been distributed equally per location and should have consulted with the state government for the distribution and not circumvent.  The acceptance of CTCL’s grants in this manner are considered violations and maladministration. 


Compliance with HAVA is to keep allocations of funds equal throughout the country to conform with the United States Constitution 14th and 15th Amendments.  Allowing funds to flow into certain cities and counties at different rates per person between localities created inequality in government by some counties getting more money for the operations of the elections and created a dilution of votes for those localities that did not have the extra funds.


The emails (obtained via FOIA’s) are between Richard Keech, LC Deputy Director of Office of Elections and Barb Lawrence, LC Grants Coordinator.  Given the fact that we just simply laid out how CTCL circumvented the VA State Government, and went directly to Loudoun County, one has to ask themselves what does Barb Lawrence mean by “less is better….we can decide what to share or not” as it relates to a FOIA request received from the Foundation for Government Accountability.  



Given the information above and comments from Barb Lawrence like “less is better….we can decide what to share or not”, you have to wonder, where did ALL of the $355,000 go?  What are they hiding?  Is the State of VA investigating?  Who was aware and when?  Did the FGA receive ALL of the documents from their FOIA request?  Bet not.


  • ESO Shoup (ballots, coding, and Oki printers): $85,000
  • This leaves Loudoun County with a CTCL grant balance of $270,000 that has been classified as “Reclass Payroll”.  This in-turn was provided to: “Non-County” for $210,000 and “Temporary Part-Time” for $60,000.  However, no one knows what this all really means.

Spending Allocation Provided by Loudoun County, CTCL Grant Funds

Loudoun County, Virginia CTCL Distribution of Funds Information Received with Items in Question Circled in Red

Jeniffer Wexton on:

public Safety

Crime has vaulted near the top of voters’ concerns, just after the economy and inflation. According to Gallup, 80 percent of Americans worry “a great deal” or a “fair amount” about crime, the highest level in two decades.


Such fears pose yet another midterm election hurdle for Democrats, on top of public angst over soaring prices and President Biden’s dismal public approval ratings.


As a former prosecutor, substitute judge, legal advocate for children, state Senator, and as a legislator, Jennifer Wexton should be well aware that our society is a dangerous place. Wexton should understand that our children, the elderly, and everyone else in between needs to be protected from violent criminals and repeat offenders. She ignores this and advocates on their behalf with light sentences, “no cash bail”, Criminal Justice Reform, and Restorative Justice.


Do you recall the rape of a (15) year old girl in a Loudoun County High School bathroom in May 2021 by a transgendered student? If this wasn’t bad enough, “Criminal Justice Reform” allowed for the rapists sentenced to be reduced, removing him from the sexual assault registry and providing supervised probation. To make matters worse, the Loudoun County Public Schools Superintendent Scott Ziegler IGNORED the federally mandated processes and procedures when incidents of this nature occur, and now Wexton is abolishing Title IX protections under HR5-Equality Act.


Jennifer Wexton got the ball rolling on the rapists lenient sentence by introducing Bill NO. 1082 in 2017, which passed (and she’s proud of it, see video during meeting with NAACP).

In 2019, Wexton proudly endorsed Buta Biberaj for Loudoun County Commonwealth Attorney. Prior to being elected, Biberaj was the legal redress for the Loudoun NAACP; this is not an insignificant detail. Biberaj also belongs to the Virginia Progressive Prosecutors For Justice. The VPPFJ’s primary goal is “Criminal Justice Reform” or “Restorative Justice”.


Wexton, Biberaj are closely aligned Progressive ideologues and share questionable associations with a variety of organizations and people.

Who could forget the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020 over George Floyd. Wexton is so radical that she sponsored the “George Floyd Justice Policing Act” (defund the police) and the “Mental Health Justice Act” that allowed for increased funding for social workers that are meant to take the place of police officers around the country.


These are only a few examples of what Wexton and the Progressive Democrats “Criminal Justice Reform” and “Restorative Justice” look like for Public Safety:


More on Wexton and Public Safety

%d bloggers like this: